<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Makes It Tough To Get Indexed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goongee.com/blog/google-makes-it-tough-to-get-indexed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goongee.com/blog/google-makes-it-tough-to-get-indexed/</link>
	<description>Goongee Search Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.goongee.com/blog/google-makes-it-tough-to-get-indexed/comment-page-1/#comment-4328</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goongee.com/blog/google-makes-it-tough-to-get-indexed/#comment-4328</guid>
		<description>Both, I think.  They appear to get spidered less and rank lower.  But I doubt it&#039;s universal.  

I wonder if they&#039;ll really stick with this setup in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both, I think.  They appear to get spidered less and rank lower.  But I doubt it&#8217;s universal.  </p>
<p>I wonder if they&#8217;ll really stick with this setup in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Jusko</title>
		<link>http://www.goongee.com/blog/google-makes-it-tough-to-get-indexed/comment-page-1/#comment-4278</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Jusko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goongee.com/blog/google-makes-it-tough-to-get-indexed/#comment-4278</guid>
		<description>I guess the question is whether the things in the supplemental index get worse rankings even if they are more relevant than sites/pages in the main index. Or does it just mean that they are Googlebotted less often?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the question is whether the things in the supplemental index get worse rankings even if they are more relevant than sites/pages in the main index. Or does it just mean that they are Googlebotted less often?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

